I get this question a lot. Claude, Cursor, Codex, they can build software, run it in the browser, ship it. Implementation is getting 100X faster. So why CodeValid?
Here’s the thing: we still believe in software developers. We still believe in teams.
Yes, teams will get smaller. Radically smaller. But you cannot get rid of them, not for complex software. You still need someone who knows the process, domain expert. And every process can be implemented in multiple right ways, so you need someone who knows software and design, design expert, who can choose between those right ways, design, optimize, maintain, and you need someone who knows sales, marketing and customer service, business expert. And when your software has real users depending on it, one person isn’t enough. You need more than one to design it, to review changes it, sell it and to maintain it.
Now look at the tools everyone’s excited about. Cursor, Claude, Codex, they’re awesome, I use it everyday! but they’re built around a single developer. One person, one perspective.
We’re not building another development tool. That race is crowded, and honestly, it’s not the problem that keeps me up at night.
The problem is this: teams come together, developers, sales, customer service, all of them. And with AI, everyone on that team now has the flexibility to dictate a change to the code and get it done in an hour. That’s incredible. But now the question is: Can we get the same velocity of single person team? If so, how do you verify the software still does what’s right for the business, and keep the team aligned, when every person carries their own version of the business in their head?
So this is our bet. A world of super-optimized teams building complex software at incredible speed, and CodeValid as the alignment and verification engine underneath it all.
Making sure that what gets built is what the business required. Building Trust.
